From East Georgia College: the latest in a string of cases involving
abuse of the "sexual harassment" codes. These codes can be used to expel students later found to be innocent (see my
previous blog entry) or
terminate faculty for speaking out against "sexual harassment" codes that lack due process.
All too often, the accused is guilty-until-proven-innocent. Even then, students and faculty can
still be thrown off campus because the administration doesn't feel they will make for a "comfortable environment." Oh, no, we can't have tenure-track faculty criticizing our administrative czars, especially if they wrap the Star Chamber with sweet sounding rhetoric about an "institutional commitment to a harassment-free campus." Offering a different viewpoint thus constitutes harassment itself!
Thank God for the lawyers at FIRE and ACLU local chapters. This is also an issue being fought by the Faculty Association. It is a battle against university lawyers who err on the side of being overprotective of those who
might be harassed. This buys them, in their way of thinking, some legal insurance against lawsuits that claim they didn't "do enough." FIRE, ACLU, FA help level the legal battlefield.
1 comment:
The main problem is that sexual harassment is a moving target. It's definition varies from person to person and each person may have different guidelines depending on who is the so called harasser or what mood they happen to be in. It's like a custom designed law that each person makes up for themselves. Societies can't function on those terms.
Post a Comment